September 02, 2024

Shifting to Substack

Wafers-

This blog will remain available for previous posts, but I am switching over to substack: morrisberman.substack.com As you all know, the blogger format changed about a month ago or so, and screwed everything up. I'm hoping this shift to substack will eliminate all of these problems, but note that substack allows for an import of only 25 previous posts. If you want to access the 375 prior posts, you have to do it on this blog. Otherwise, please use substack. Sorry for the headache, which was beyond my control.

-mb

August 14, 2024

Postscript: A Passion for Cruelty: A Nation Spinning Out of Control

In Gaza, Israel Lost What Remained of Its Humanity.
—Gideon Levy, Haaretz, 24 July 2024
The previous essay, “The Origins of Sadism,” was written in early June of this year. I thought I had said all there was to say about the horrible war in Gaza, naively believing it couldn’t get worse. Between then and early August, however, I began printing out articles about that war, articles from reliable sources such as CNN, The Guardian, Haaretz, and a few others. When the pile was more than an inch thick, I realized I had to arbitrarily stop reading, because there didn’t seem to be an end in sight to Israeli massacres of the Palestinians, and the gruesome, one has to say barbaric, treatment of these people.
What follows is the information I have culled from news reports published during June, July, and a few days in August. This time around, I don’t believe I have said all there is to say, because it seems that continuous war is the real Israeli agenda and a ceasefire is not. “Depressing” doesn’t begin to cover it. But it strikes me as extremely important to provide a summary of these events, put it out there, in one place, for all to see—at least for these two months. It beggars the imagination: the destruction of an entire people, and the transformation of a nation that had once cornered the market on “moral capital,” to one that is unrecognizable, one that enjoys very little respect, and is regarded by much of the planet as a pariah. It is not hyperbole to say that Israel has become the face of evil. Quelle horreur!
The sections of this summary are as follows:
A)Torture and extreme cruelty
B)Lies, denial, and attempted coverups
C)Massacres, including the targeted bombing of hospitals, schools, universities, food and humanitarian aid delivery trucks, refugee camps, and supposed “safe zones,” which are anything but
D)Palestinian death statistics
E)Conclusion: the road to suicide
A)Torture and extreme cruelty
Let’s start with the first data point listed in “Sadism.” The concentration camp I am referring to has a name: Sde Teiman (תימן שדה), which is located in the Negev, eighteen miles from the border with Gaza. In late June, the detention facility was visited by a lawyer named Khaled Mahajneh, whose report corroborated accounts of Palestinians being raped with sticks and sexually assaulted by Israeli soldiers. (The report was originally published in a Hebrew newspaper, Mekomit. Details of these horrific events were also reported by the New York Times and CNN.) Attack dogs are also used to intimidate, beat, and sexually assault detainees. The detainees, most of whom are ordinary civilians, are provided with a slice of bread and a small piece of cucumber or tomato per day.(11)
The use of attack dogs is not limited to Sde Teiman, however. They serve as a frequent “tool” in Israeli prisons, military operations, and in raids on Palestinian homes—a terror technique that, ironically enough, the Nazis used against the Jews. The IDF frequently mocks the victims of the attacks, laughs at them, even when they are starving. According to Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, “the recent attack on Dawlat Al-Tanani, an elderly woman in Gaza City whose mauling by a dog was caught on video and went viral, is not an isolated incident.” The soldiers laughed at her while she was screaming.(12)
The use of the dogs to maul civilians is not atypical in Israel; in at least one case, it was fairly ghoulish. In late 2023, in the hospital courtyard of the Al-Shifa Medical Complex, the dogs were used to maul dead bodies, as well as displaced people. In addition, the dogs are made to rape prisoners and detainees, and also to urinate on them. It doesn’t get much more depraved than this.(13)
Or so you would think. When Gideon Levy wrote (see epigraph, above) that Israel had lost its humanity, he was referring to another ghoulish event. For no discernable reason, on July 3 the IDF (in fact, several dozen soldiers) unleashed an attack dog on a young man, Mohammed Bhar, who had Down’s syndrome (he was also autistic), in his home. The dog ripped Mohammed apart, while the soldiers drove his mother out of their house, her screams notwithstanding. He subsequently bled to death. The family was allowed to return home a week later, at which time they found his rotting body. “From now on,” wrote Levy, “only Jewish lives count. From now on, we can do anything to Palestinians. Even sic dogs on people with special needs.” The soldiers “let him die in agony, which touched the heart of almost no one in Israel in 2024.”(14)
Levy was certainly correct when he said that the Israelis can do anything they want to the Palestinians. Here is another (incredible) example of the nation’s depravity. On August 5, Bezalel Smotrich, Israel’s finance minister, declared that “it may be just and moral” to starve two million Gaza residents until Israeli hostages are returned. Clearly, Mr. Smotrich is not a Jew in the Rabbi Hillel mold (top epigraph). What can one say in response to such sickness? A leading politician declares that it is just and moral to starve two million people. The country has apparently moved beyond the grotesque into the realm of the surreal.(15)
Moving on: at one point, the human rights group B’Tselem conducted interviews with fifty-five former prisoners who were housed in jails run by the IDF. As reported by The Guardian, they “described abuse ranging from severe beatings and sexual violence to starvation rations, refusal of medical care, and deprivation of basic needs including water, daylight, electricity and sanitation, including soap and sanitary pads for women….The highly respected Jerusalem-based group concluded that Israel’s prisons should now be labelled ‘torture camps’.” Meanwhile, in typical fashion, the IDF denied all of this, and conveniently for the torturers, the Israeli government “denied access to lawyers, family members, and Red Cross inspectors.”(16)
On July 25, a large group of American doctors and nurses who worked in Gaza sent President Biden a long letter detailing their experience there. They claimed that violence was particularly directed at children. “Specifically,” they wrote, “every one of us on a daily basis treated pre-teen children who were shot in the head.” (Italics in original) Mark Perlmutter, an orthopedic surgeon, wrote: “Gaza was the first time I held a baby’s brains in my hand. The first of many.” The letter also reported that women had to undergo C-sections without anesthesia; all that was available was Tylenol.(17)
Killing Palestinian children is apparently high priority for the IDF. A key example of this is the practice of packing weapons with shrapnel, designed to cause brutal injuries to them; which has been quite “successful.” Writing in The Guardian on July 11, Chris McGreal reports:
Israeli-made weapons designed to spray high levels of shrapnel are causing horrific injuries to civilians in Gaza and disproportionately harming children, foreign surgeons who worked in the territory in recent months have told the Guardian. The doctors say many of the deaths, amputations and life changing wounds to children they have treated came from the firing of missiles and shells – in areas crowded with civilians – packed with additional metal designed to fragment into tiny pieces of shrapnel. Volunteer doctors at two Gaza hospitals said that a majority of their operations were on children hit by small pieces of shrapnel that leave barely discernible entry wounds but create extensive destruction inside the body. Amnesty International has said that the weapons appear designed to maximise casualties.
The X-ray photos of bodies containing these fragments, which are included in the July 11 Guardian article, are pretty gruesome. The embedment of these fragments in the body often requires amputation of limbs, and UNICEF estimates that during the first ten weeks of the war, about 1,000 children lost one or both of their legs to these operations.(18)
I’d like to close out this section with just a bit more evidence on Israel’s loss of humanity. I’m referring to the far-right riots at two military bases on July 29, attacks that actually included members of the Knesset (Parliament). The Israeli military has been engaged in an investigation into the alleged rape of a Palestinian detainee at the Sde Teiman detention camp. Ten reserve IDF soldiers were suspected of participating in this crime. This investigation triggered an angry confrontation between the military and police forces and the IDF (which actually used pepper spray on the police). The Public Committee Against Torture in Israel had this to say: “Instead of absolute condemnation [of the protesters], some Israeli far-right leaders have rallied to support the suspects of abuse, which is emblematic of the root causes that enable such abuse to happen in the first place.” Haaretz said the event was evidence of a “deep moral deterioration” caused by the occupation. (Duh!) Unfortunately, most Israelis would not agree. The truth is that the views of the protesters are pretty much those of mainstream Israeli society. Owen Jones, commenting on YouTube on August 2, said that “Israeli citizens are rioting in the streets in support of the right to rape Palestinians while Israeli politicians are debating the right to rape.” Israel, he concluded, is in the grip of a “genocidal mania.”(19)
B)Lies, denial, and attempted coverups
This section will not require a lot of evidence. Lies, denial, and coverups constitute the Israeli national sport; all of this is in the historical record, and I don’t feel a great need to prove it. They’ve been doing it for decades, and they continue to do it today. It especially applies to war crimes, illegal activities, violations of international law, and anything that might reflect badly on the state. In my own experience, arguing with a Zionist is a colossal waste of time. If, for example, you refer to the work of Ilan Pappe (The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, which is rich in photos and data), the response will be (which it actually was, once) that he is “a poisoned propagandist.” No attempt to wrestle with his empirical evidence; no, just come out with an emotional, ad hominem argument. The slightest critique of Israel is immediately met with charges of antisemitism—a fraudulent game Zionists have been playing for ages now. The German word for this is totschlagargument: a deathblow. It’s so massive, that there is no way to win it. If you point out that you are not opposed to Judaism, but rather to Zionism and the gruesome destruction of the Palestinian people, you simply won’t be heard (most Israelis, as well as most American Jews, are always ready to play the race card). If you happen to be Jewish, you are obviously a “self-hating Jew,” an old canard designed to shut you up. You can respond by saying that no, you are proud to be a Jew, in the mold of Rabbi Hillel, but that genocide committed by Jews makes you sick to your stomach—all to no avail.
A major reason for this is that the Jews were traumatized by the Holocaust, and rightly so. I also lost family members to mass graves in Poland, and my disgust with Holocaust deniers is second to none. But it’s a trauma that many, if not most, Jews can’t seem to get over, as though they were living in Germany during 1941-45. And so, in Edward Said’s famous phrase, the Palestinians are “the victims of the victims.” Genocide received, genocide passed on. Damaged people damage people. And so on. Lies, denial, and coverups follow naturally from the terror that is embedded in the Jewish psyche. In 1948, after all, the foundation of the Israeli state was understandably seen as salvation, a haven in a heartless world. It must be protected at all costs, at the expense of others if necessary.
Why has Netanyahu been the longest running prime minister, then? The answer is not hard to fathom: he loathes the Palestinians and sees them as the ultimate threat to Israel. So most Israelis are not bothered by the fact that he goes to Washington on July 24 and gives what Nancy Pelosi rightly called “the worst presentation of any foreign dignitary invited and honored with the privilege of addressing the Congress of the United States.” She’s right: it was a pile of crap. But happily, a tiny handful of leading Israeli figures regard Bibi, not the Palestinians, as the real threat to Israel. On July 23, a group of more than thirty prominent Israeli figures—former national security officials, eminent academics and businessmen—sent American congressional leaders a blistering letter arguing just that. The list included a Nobel laureate in chemistry, two former presidents of Ben Gurion University, five former members of Mossad(!), and a billionaire entrepreneur (Morris Kahn). One month earlier, retired Mossad director Tamir Pardo called on Congress to disinvite Netanyahu, calling the invitation a “terrible mistake.”(20)
Unfortunately, these folks don’t represent mainstream Israeli opinion. Netanyahu came to Washington, and delivered his speech—gaslighting his enemies and delivering a pack of lies that sounded like a typical Trump speech. Fact-checking the speech exposes all of this; it reveals that he made a number of claims that were false, or lacking in context, or lacking any evidence to back them up. As might be expected, neither the Israeli people, nor the US Republican party, found this problematic. Thus he argued that Israel allowed more than 40,000 aid trucks to enter Gaza. This obscures the fact that many of the deliveries never reached their intended recipients; that many of these trucks were carrying commercial goods, not humanitarian aid; and that the criteria for entry were typically arbitrary and/or extremely strict.
Second example: Netanyahu claimed that there were no civilian deaths resulting from the attack on Rafah, except for one accidental one. Totally untrue. There were numerous Palestinian deaths as a result of Israel’s military assault on the city.(21)
And the list goes on: the ratio of combatant-civilian casualties, Iran supposedly funding US protesters, Gazans supposedly not starving (they were, and are), and if they were it was due to Hamas stealing their food. All of this b.s. has been refuted by empirical evidence and reliable testimony. But Bibi remains the poster child for genocide, and for the Israeli practice of outright dishonesty. Would it really be a stretch to call him a psychopath? And if not, what does this say about the Israeli people as a whole, who kept returning him to office?
C)Massacres and targeted bombing, inter alia
Let’s start with the Israeli claim about the existence of “safe zones.” On July 13 Israel attacked the supposed “humanitarian zone” of al-Mawasi, in Gaza, killing ninety Palestinians. The IDF dismissed this as collateral damage of targeting Hamas, and that they were operating based on “precise intelligence.” (Always an excuse, as I discussed in section B, above) Ori Goldberg, who teaches at Reichman University in Herzliya, had this to say:
[It is] impossible to exaggerate the level of criminality, immorality, and crass, murderous stupidity that come together in the massacre Israel carried out in al-Mawasi this morning….Israel forces ‘evacuation’, Israel bombs, Israel knows, Israel attacks and kills, Israel sets conditions, Israel balks. Israel has run out of options. It knows only death.”(22)
Several days later, Israel shrank the “humanitarian zone” of the Gazan city of Khan Younis and attacked it. Dozens were killed, and 400,000 were forced to flee, being given something like thirty minutes warning that there would be an attack. They were not told where they should go. Again, Israel trotted out the “we were after Hamas” excuse. The massacres pile up, and the data on the massacres also pile up.(23)
The IDF has also been busy killing or detaining Gaza’s doctors. Five hundred killed, 300 detained, according to the World Health Organization, and as reported in the New York Times for August 2. Some of the doctors who were released reported being tortured in Israeli jails; others died in custody. (The Israeli prison service has declined to comment.) The Times article provides a partial list of doctors to whom these things happened. Meanwhile, Israel began to prevent physicians with Palestinian heritage from entering Gaza. (Documented in internal memos from the World Health Organization) Again, there is an eerie parallel to the Nazi program of trying to define who was a Jew. For the Nazis, as for the Israelis, one Jewish/Palestinian grandparent would do it.(24)
It doesn’t stop there. Israel began to restrict the entry of medical supplies into Gaza. Frequently rejected items include anesthetics, oxygen cylinders, ventilators, maternity kits, and cancer meds. The UN reported that thirty-two out of thirty-six hospitals have been damaged or destroyed—this in addition to the 500 health care workers murdered, as mentioned above.(25)
One of the more bizarre developments in the delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza is the decision of the US and Israel to allow tax-deductible donations to far-right groups that have blocked those deliveries--! Three groups that have done this (including one accused of looting the supplies) have raised more than $200,000 from donors in the two countries. An incredible policy, it seems to me; “sick” would probably be a more accurate word for it.(26)
D)Let’s move on to the death estimates
The official Israeli figure for Palestinian deaths is around 37,000. The problem with this number is that it is based on direct killing; it does not take what is called indirect killing into account. This got addressed by the prestigious British medical journal, The Lancet, in July. We need to quote this in extenso:
Armed conflicts have indirect health implications beyond the direct harm from violence. Even if the conflict ends immediately, there will continue to be many indirect deaths in the coming months and years from causes such as reproductive, communicable, and non-communicable diseases. The total death toll is expected to be large given the intensity of this conflict; destroyed health-care infrastructure; severe shortages of food, water, and shelter; [and] the population’s inability to flee to safe places….
In recent conflicts, such indirect deaths range from three to 15 times the number of direct deaths. Applying a conservative estimate of four indirect deaths per one direct death to the 37 396 deaths reported, it is not implausible that up to 186 000 or even more deaths could be attributable to the current conflict in Gaza.(27)
The British author and award-winning journalist, Jonathan Cook, has also weighed in on the subject, claiming that the official Israeli death toll figure is a lie. For one thing, he points out, it ignores death by famine, which has been going on for several months. To this we need to add conditions such as lack of water, the weakened health of the Palestinians (including chronic illnesses), and epidemics (possibly including polio). The Lancet figure of 186,000, he notes, represents 8 percent of the population. But, he goes on to say, “that figure assumes that Israel’s current slaughter and starvation policies come to an immediate halt, and that international organizations are able to bring in emergency aid. There are precisely no signs that Israel is going to allow any of that to happen.” Thus medical experts for The Lancet estimate that the actual death toll could rise to 600,000—25 percent of the population. This would suggest that my claim in my “Sadism” article, that the real goal of the Israeli government is not the defeat of Hamas, but the extermination of the Palestinians, has some validity. At this point, it hardly seems far-fetched.(28)
E)Conclusion: The road to suicide
Recall my quote from Ori Goldberg in section C, above: “Israel has run out of options. It knows only death.” This is the tragedy of Israel’s deep-seeded hatred of the Palestinians, and its desire to wipe them out. It can only redound on Israel: karma with a vengeance. If you pursue death, death will eventually pursue you. Israel is seen by many, if not most, countries of the world as a pariah state, in denial of the genocide it commits on a daily basis. Kenneth Roth, attorney and human rights activist, writes that the IDF has destroyed much of Gaza, once home to 2.1 million Palestinians. It has “attacked, with little if any military justification…all twelve of Gaza’s universities and 80 percent of its schools, as well as libraries, museums, and cultural heritage sites.” Meanwhile, the whole world is watching, taking note of Israeli cruelty. The International Criminal Court, led by the British lawyer Karim Khan (he has served as Prosecutor for the ICC since 2021), has issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Israel’s defense minister, Yoav Gallant, for their starvation strategy being wreaked on the Palestinians. Ultimately, Israel won’t get away with its program of butchery. I personally believe it is on the road to self-destruction, with no ability to turn back. It is also very hard for me to realize that it is Jews who are doing all this. Haven’t we always stood for justice, freedom, equality? But the Israelis are hardly Rabbi Hillel’s type of Jews. What the fuck happened?(29)
Signs of the times: Israel has lost a great deal of support from its traditional sponsor, the United States. To win pro-Israel elections in America (defeating candidates like Cori Bush, or Jamal Bowman), Aipac (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) now has to spend huge sums of money, whereas in the past it was not necessary for pro-Israel interest groups to insert themselves into American electoral politics. Their cultural hegemony, writes Yousef Munayyer (head of the Palestine/Israel program at the Arab Center in Washington), assured them victory with very little effort. Those days, he argues, are over. “A Pew poll from March 2023 found that for the first time, Democrats had more sympathy for Palestinians than Israelis.” The barbarity displayed by Israel in its 2014-15 war on Gaza was a turning point in this regard, and the current campaign of mass atrocities will be an even greater one. Dozens of countries, he notes, believe Israel is committing genocide. And this time, a lot more gruesome, sadistic imagery flashes around the globe—often posted on social media sites by the Israeli soldiers themselves. In a word, the whole world is watching, and it is horrified by what it is seeing. What this amounts to, I believe, is the Israeli sunset. The worse it makes things for the Palestinians, the worse it makes things for itself.(30)
In a word, it’s the end-game for Israel; I can’t imagine it making it to its one-hundredth birthday (2048). It chose a path that was sad, and stupid, not to say horrific, and is now paying the price.
©Morris Berman, 2024
Notes(11-30)
1.“Hamas Massacre: Documented War Crimes,” at hamas-massacre.net.
2. Palestinian death toll in Gaza tops 36,000: health authorities-Xinhua (news.cn)
3. https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/23/whistleblowers-allege-widespread-abuses-at-israeli-detention-camp-sde-teiman; Sde Teiman: Israel phasing out use of desert detention camp after CNN investigation detailing abuses | CNN; Sde Teiman: Israeli whistleblowers detail abuse of Palestinians in shadowy detention center | CNN. See also these two videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_2RGyUCYaU and CNN exclusive: Israeli whistleblowers detail abuse of Palestinians in Sde Teiman prison - YouTube.
4. Israeli Settlers Are Terrorizing Palestinians In Record Numbers (youtube.com); David Shulman, “Israel: The Way Out,” New York Review of Books, 9 May 2024, pp. 10 and 12.
5.https://x.com/OwenJones84/status/1792180925201109153 and 'No longer justifiable': Israel faces international condemnation for strike in Rafah | The Times of Israel; Israeli forces launch new ground and air assault on central Gaza, killing at least 15 Palestinians | CNN
6. Most Israelis dislike Netanyahu, but support the war in Gaza – an Israeli scholar explains what’s driving public opinion (theconversation.com); Shulman, “Israel: The Way Out,” p. 10.
7.The following is taken from my portrait of Adler in my book Healing (Independent publication, 2023), pp. 6-13.
8.Both Ya’alon and Eitan are quoted in my book Dark Ages America (New York: W.W. Norton, 2006), pp. 197-98. Eitan was implicated in the Sabra and Shatila massacres of 1982.
9.On this and the following see Ernest Becker, The Denial of Death (New York: Free Press, 1973), and Wikipedia, “The Denial of Death.” The frenzy for meaning was studied extensively by Eric Hoffer in The True Believer (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1951).
10.Ernest Becker, “The Spectrum of Loneliness,” Humanitas, 10 (1974), pp. 237-46.
11.Middle East Monitor, “Lawyer visits Israel’s ‘death ca
mp’ and gives harrowing account of rape of Palestinian detainees,” http://www.middleeastmonitor/com/20240627; Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, “Gaza: Israeli army systematically uses police dogs to brutally attack Palestinian civilians, with at least one reported rape,” https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/6383/Gaza. Note that Sicha Mekomit is a website; the words mean Local Call.
12.Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, “Gaza…” (see n.11).
13.Ibid. Another echo of Nazi practice: they would break into a synagogue and force the rabbi to urinate on the Torah scrolls.
14.Gideon Levy, “In Gaza, Israel Lost What Remained of Its Humanity,” Haaretz, 24 July 2024; Fergal Keane, “Gaza man with Down’s syndrome attacked by IDF dog and left to die, mother tells BBC,” bbc.com, 19 July 2024.
15.Dana Karni, “Israeli minister says it may be ‘moral’ to starve 2 million Gazans, but ‘no one in the world would let us’,” CNN, 6 August 2024.
16.Bethan McKernan et al., “Palestinian prisoners describe systemic abuse in Israel’s jails,” The Guardian, 5 August 2024.
17.Chris McGreal, “US medics who volunteered in Gaza demand arms embargo over ‘unbearable cruelty’ inflicted by Israel,” The Guardian, 25 July 2024.
18.Chris McGreal, “Israeli weapons packed with shrapnel causing devastating injuries to children in Gaza, doctors say,” The Guardian, 11 July 2024. This practice is reminiscent of the use of cluster bombs by other nations, although Israel did use these bombs in Lebanon in 1978 and the 1980s. This off the Internet: “The United States has used cluster munitions with devastating consequences in Southeast Asia (Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam) in the 1960s and 1970s, the Persian Gulf (Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia) in 1991, the former Yugoslavia (now Serbia, Montenegro, and Kosovo) in 1999, Afghanistan in 2001 and 2002, Iraq in 2003, and Yemen in 2009.” More recently, it supplied the Ukraine with these weapons. Cluster bombs release small bomblets which are difficult to locate and remove (as in the case of shrapnel). They can kill or maim civilians long after a war is over.
19.Ruth Michaelson et al., “Israeli inquest into alleged abuse of Palestinian detainees sparks far-right fury,” The Guardian, 29 July 2024; Bethan McKernan, “‘Deep moral deterioration’ being normalized in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,” The Guardian, 30 July 2024. In 2016, an IDF soldier, Elor Azaria, walked over to Abdel Fattah al-Sharif, who was lying on the ground, and shot him in the head. More than half of the Israeli public was on Azaria’s side. He served nine months in jail for manslaughter, and when he was released in 2018, it was to a hero’s welcome.
See also the following videos on YouTube: Democracy Now!, “Israel’s Torture & Rape of Palestinian Prisoners Defended by Knesset Members, Far-Right Mobs,” 2 August 2024; Owen Jones, “Israelis Riot in Support of Torture,” 2 August 2024; and Novara Media, “Israelis Storm Prison After IDF Soldiers Arrested For Sexual Assault Of Palestinian,” 30 July 2024.
20.Alex Marquardt, “Israeli former national security officials and business leaders blast Netanyahu ahead of his speech to Congress,” CNN, 23 July 2024.
21.Zeena Saifi, “Fact-checking Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s address to Congress,” CNN, 25 July 2024.
22.Julia Conley, “At Least 90 Palestinians Killed in Israeli Massacre in ‘Safe Zone’ of al-Mawasi,” commondreams.org, 13 July 2024.
23.Abeer Salman et al., “Dozens killed and thousands flee as Israel shrinks ‘humanitarian zone’ in Gaza,” CNN, 23 July 2024; Malak Tantesh and Ruth Michaelson, “‘Like judgment day’: evacuees tell of fleeing Israel’s assault on Khan Younis,” The Guardian, 27 July 2024. On additional massacres (e.g.): Ruth Michaelson, “Wave of Israeli airstrikes kills at least 50 people in Gaza,” The Guardian, 27 July 2024; Ami Kaufman and Bianna Golodryga, “Palestinian homes were destroyed ‘for revenge’, says Israeli soldier who served in Gaza,” CNN, 1 August 2024; Kareem Khadder et al., “At least 30 killed in Israeli strike on two Gaza school shelters: Palestinian Civil Defense,” CNN, 4 August 2024—etc. and etc.
24.Anjana Sankar, “Many of Gaza’s Medical Workers Have Been Detained or Killed,” New York Times, 2 August 2004; Yahya Abou-Ghazala and Alex Marquardt, “Israel is blocking physicians with Palestinian heritage from entering Gaza,” CNN, 24 July 2024.
25.Abou-Ghazala and Marquardt, “Israel is blocking…” (see n.23).
26.From the Associated Press in Jerusalem, “US and Israel allowed tax-deductible donations to groups blocking Gaza aid,” The Guardian, 16 July 2024.
27.Rasha Khatib et al., “Counting the dead in Gaza: difficult but essential,” thelancet.com, Vol. 404, 20 July 2024.
28.Jonathan Cook, “The Official Death Toll in Gaza Is a Lie. The Casualty Numbers Are Far, Far Higher,” antiwar.com/blog/2024/07/31, 31 July 2024; The Cradle, “Gaza death toll could reach half a million: Lancet,” at thecradle.co/articles-id/25821, 8 July 2024.
29.Kenneth Roth, “Crimes of War in Gaza,” New York Review of Books, 18 July 2024, pp. 34-39.
30.Yousef Munayyer, “US support for Israel is collapsing. And Aipac knows it,” The Guardian, 7 August 2024.

July 21, 2024

Karma Comes to America

I was a student at Cornell in 1965 or '66, when 10 or 12 members of the SDS decided to try to block a ROTC awards ceremony, to take place in the gym. Reaction against them was fierce; the cops had to form a cordon to protect them, so they could leave the room unharmed. (Today, the cops would just beat them senseless.) Of course, in the fullness of time, they were proved right: our war on Vietnam was barbaric and unjustified, and the student body of Cornell—most of them, that is—were little more than brainwashed fools. Much like the rest of the country.

And so now we drift toward fascism, our karmic destiny. In May, I gave a talk at the Museum of Fine Arts in Houston, and a young woman asked me: “Can you say exactly when the US will collapse?” It was funny, in a dark sort of way. I said to her: “Just look around. It’s happening even as we speak.” (I talked about the national debt, the daily massacres, the widespread corruption, the intellectual poverty of our universities, and so on.) The fact is that Americans are suffering. Economically, certainly, but also emotionally and spiritually. They are an angry, depressed people. And from one pt of view, they deserve to be punished; I personally believe they brought all of this on themselves. But the word "punishment" doesn’t really work in this context, because it implies that you understand what it is you did wrong. And Americans simply cannot grasp this; they believe they did nothing wrong. They may be naïve and stupid, but this response is honest, at least. Here’s what most of them might say:

-They told me to hustle, so I hustled. They told me life was abt material acquisition, so that ’s what I pursued. (And now, my life is empty, because consumerism is empty.)
-They told me socialism was evil, had absolutely no redeeming features. I believed them. (Now I see I could have benefited from an expansion of socialism beyond Social Security.)
-They told me that we were right to kill off the Native Americans, and shove what was left of them onto reservations. I agreed with this, although truth be told, I never gave it much thought. (I can see now, in retrospect, that the “kinship world view” seems a much better way to live than capitalist competition.)
-I cheered America’s wars (until we lost them), in Vietnam and elsewhere. Imperialism, genocide—these things were OK with me, because I believed America could do no wrong. Any country we opposed was by definition evil. -I rejected, ignored, or hated those Americans who provided fundamental critiques of our way of life—or really, any critiques. (There were plenty of these around; I didn’t want to hear about it.)
-I also looked with scorn on anyone who was different, who cared about the life of the mind, who didn’t think that becoming rich was a meaningful goal of life. I hated intellectuals, and I had no use for poetry, which I regarded as irrelevant, or even stupid.

Here is a critic whom Americans would have hated, if they even knew he existed: Wallace Shawn, in The Fever:
“Cowards who sit in lecture halls or the halls of state denouncing the crimes of the revolutionaries are not as admirable as the farmers and nuns who ran so swiftly into the wind, who ran silently into death. The ones I killed were not the worst people in all those places; in fact, they were the best.”

Looking back now at that SDS confrontation with ROTC: Who were the best people, in that gym so long ago? The SDS, who were trying to stop a cruel and immoral war, or the student body, who were blindly soaking in hatred for them, out of a misguided sense of patriotism?

And in general: Are Americans the best? My guess is that History will judge us as being among the worst. So let’s embrace our karma, in the form of Trump and fascism. It will ring down the curtain on one of the most violent regimes in the history of the world.

(c)Morris Berman, 2024

July 02, 2024

And So, We Come to the End

Wafers-

Let me begin by quoting my last message, on the previous thread:

"Let's get real. The 2nd presidential debate is scheduled for Sept. 10th. Schmiden will not, between now and then, or after, step aside as the Democratic candidate. He may shine this time around (altho not likely), but it won't make any difference. On Nov. 5th, he'll get creamed. He'll have his ass handed to him on a silver platter. Or it may be close, but either way, he will be defeated, and Trumpaloni will become the president-elect. And why, my friends, why? It all comes down to this: Schmiden is a douchebag. There is simply no denying this core fact. It won't matter that Trumpi is lower than pond scum, a fascist and a total bulvan. All that matters is that Schmiden is a douchebag, and douchebags are unelectable.

"And with that, we will enter the end phase of the American empire."

The fact is, with this incredible, anti-democratic decision, the Supreme Court handed Trumpi a victory in November. (Imagine: the SC ruled that Trump was above the law. Gott in Himmel!) It makes no difference if Schmiden is replaced by Gov. Newsom or anyone else. At this pt, Trumpi cd be running against God, and still win. I predicted the end of America in the Twilight book, 24 years ago. I spelled out what had to be done if America was to avert disaster. Not only was this ignored (whoever heard of me, anyway?), but in the case of each of the 4 factors of decline I indicated, that needed to be arrested, the US did exactly the opposite, thus accelerating the decline. 24 years later, it has all come to pass. Trump will win, and America will be effectively finished by 2030. I mean, come on: Cassandra (me) has been right all along; is it likely that my predictive powers have suddenly deserted me? Dark times await us, amigos, and they are going to be very dark.

On the bright side, getting the US off the international stage, relegating it to 3rd-rate status, means it won't be able to do as much damage as it usually does. From rogue country to broken country, we might describe it. (Consider the post-imperial impotence of England, as a gd example of this.) Most of the planet will hardly mourn our passing; ca va sans dire. Karma, my friends; karma. You reap what you sow.

-mb

June 08, 2024

The Origins of Sadism

Wafers-

For a while now, I've been working on a new collection of essays. It's coming slowly, might take me 3 or 4 years. You have already read the first of these (scroll back a few posts), "The Never-Ending Conflict." The second is a family history, which I'm reluctant to post right now, esp. since this blog is about the collapse of America, and not about me. So here is essay #3, which documents Israeli sadism--something the US is only too happy to defend, and even support. I wrote it 2 or 3 weeks ago; given the intermittent but unfailing acts of Israeli sadism, it may already be a bit dated. But I also wanted to think about sadism in general, and why human beings--at least in "civilization"--engage in it. (War only dates from around 12,000 B.C., as a number of anthropologists and archaeologists have confirmed.) Anyway, here it is.

There is a story that around the time of Christ, a Roman centurion approached the eminent religious leader, Rabbi Hillel, and asked him to summarize the Torah for him in the time that he (the centurion) could balance himself on one foot. “What is hateful to you, don’t do to others,” said Hillel. “All the rest is merely elaboration.”

I have had numerous occasions, since 7 October 2023, to reflect on Hillel’s words—an early version of the Golden Rule, if you will. On that day, Hamas military forces entered the Be’eri kibbutz in southern Israel and murdered over 1,200 men, women, and children. The shock at this horror was worldwide, and much of humanity, Jews in particular, are still reeling from it.(1)

But a similar worldwide reaction occurred at the Israeli response to this, which was grossly disproportionate. Eight months after October 7, the IDF, or Israeli army, had murdered 36,000 Palestinians in the Gaza strip, two-thirds of whom were women and children—36,000 and counting.(2) Horrible, to be sure, and in the opinion of many nations of the world, a clear case of genocide. But what especially caught my attention were the instances of sadism visited upon the Palestinians by the IDF, which had left Hillel’s admonition behind, in the dust, if indeed it had ever thought about it. How could Jews, who had suffered such treatment at the hands of the Nazis, repeat that very behavior? We can be sure that the many of the grandparents, or great-grandparents, of these Israeli soldiers perished in the Holocaust, so what were these soldiers thinking?

Here are some of the data regarding this sadism that I managed to fish off the Internet:

-The existence of a concentration camp in Israel, where Palestinians are made to lie on cots with hoods over their heads for fifteen hours. They are also so tightly shackled—wrists and ankles, for weeks on end—that amputations of limbs are often necessary.(3)

-Brutality of Israeli settlers and the IDF towards the Palestinians. David Shulman, who is a peace activist and Professor Emeritus at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, is intimately acquainted with what is going on here. He reports that marauding gangs of heavily armed settlers—armed by the Israeli government, in fact—have been destroying Palestinian villages, including sheep, goats, food supplies, water tanks, wind turbines, and sometimes, the villagers themselves. The settlers, he writes, are fanatical/messianic Zionists, but it is more than that: “we who have seen these people in action…can confirm that many of them are driven by sheer sadistic pleasure.”(4)

-The Israeli massacre in Rafah on 26 May 2024, and in central Gaza on June 3(5)

-I also came across a report of the IDF torturing the Palestinians, then putting videos of this on Israeli TV; Israelis watched the videos and sat there laughing. Another video shows members of the IDF laughing at Palestinians who have no food or water. A popular IDF T-shirt shows a pregnant Palestinian woman within the crosshairs of a rifle, with the caption: “Two for One”. Meanwhile, the IDF has bombed hospitals, refugee centers, food delivery vehicles, and has done everything it could to prevent relief supplies from entering Gaza.

-Finally, it should be noted that all of these activities are not just the work of Benjamin Netanyahu: most Israelis support the war on Gaza. It is noteworthy that Netanyahu is the longest-serving prime minister in Israeli history (more than sixteen years), and that over a million Israelis voted for him in the last election (2022).(6)

So we need to ask: What is the motive behind all of this (which I take to be partly, or even largely, unconscious)? What is it trying to demonstrate, and to whom? This sadism is surely superfluous to defeating Hamas, so why torture the Palestinian people? It seems completely baffling. Is it?

Let me offer two possible explanations for this, the first associated with the Austrian psychotherapist Alfred Adler (1870-1937), the second with the American anthropologist Ernest Becker (1924-1974). Let’s start with Adler.(7)

Adler was the man who coined the term “inferiority complex,” and his theory of why human beings were so destructive is rooted in that concept. From a very early age, he claimed, human beings harbored deep feelings of inferiority and insecurity. To compensate for this, they went 180 degrees in the opposite direction, i.e., they adopted a posture of superiority. Desperate for security, and for affection, they are thus caught in a state of permanent aggression, a “will to power.” This, he went on to say, is “the guiding force which directs all human activities.” The drive is to prove, to demonstrate, that one is better than others.

Now back to the sadism of the Israelis. Jews have been regarded as inferior beings, untermenschen, throughout their history. “Vermin,” the Nazis called them. A number of historians have argued that the real goal, for the Germans, in World War II was not victory over the Allied powers, but the extermination of the Jews. Hitler was so hell-bent on this that in terms of military strategy, he made a number of crucial blunders because his real war was against the Jews. And it was not enough to merely wipe them out: they had to be tortured, brutalized, be the victims of savage medical experiments, and so on. In Adlerian terms, they had to be shown that while the Germans were the superior race, they were the inferior one; and sadistic treatment “surely” makes this clear to all concerned. This, then, so the theory goes, gave meaning and purpose to German lives. In effect, it “proved” to the Germans that they existed. Isn’t it obvious that the Israelis are doing the same thing to the Palestinians, and for the same reason? The real goal of the war on Gaza is not the defeat of Hamas, but the extermination of the Palestinians, and the demonstration of alleged Jewish superiority. In an effort to prevent another Holocaust from happening (evoked by the October 7 massacre at Be’eri), the Israelis are now perpetrating their own holocaust on a largely civilian population, with torture added to the mix, and not incidentally.

What could be more Adlerian than this? General Moshe Ya’alon, the former Israeli army chief of staff, declaring that the “Palestinians must be made to understand in the deepest recesses of their consciousness that they are a defeated people.” Or the statement of General Rafael Eitan, also a former army chief of staff, that the Palestinians were “drugged cockroaches in a bottle.” Ugly sentiments, to be sure; one could even call them sick. The problem is that these are sentiments that are apparently shared by many, if not most, Israelis.(8)

(The flip side of the coin, of course, is that the October 7 massacre can be seen as the attempt on the part of Hamas to show the Israelis that the Palestinians, and not the “Chosen People,” were the true superior race, or at least equal to it.)

With Becker, in any case, our explanation goes a bit deeper, although it can be seen to mesh with Adler’s analysis. His magnum opus, The Denial of Death (1973), posits the notion that civilization is a defense mechanism against the knowledge of our mortality. Nonexistence—death—is the ultimate horror to be avoided, and we do this by what he calls heroism, or the “immortality project,” which is designed to transcend death. It is essentially a symbolic belief system, allowing people to feel they are part of some larger cause. This in turn gives them the feeling that their lives have meaning. Larger causes are, of course, many and varied, and include things such as Zionism, the American mythology of the “City upon a Hill,” and so on.(9)

The problem arises when one immortality project/larger cause conflicts with another immortality project. Each side is determined to show that its belief system is superior to the other one, and this, says Becker, is the motor of human conflict, including racism and genocide. Following Adler, we might call this heroism “betterness”; it operates on both the individual and the social level. The fight to the death, to demonstrate superiority, is ultimately the fight to prove that one exists. And for this, within this zero-sum framework, the other side has to non-exist. Killing and torture are not far away. One has to ask if the human race can ever stop doing this.

Becker wanted to take this last question on, and tried to in an essay entitled “The Spectrum of Loneliness.” It may have been the last thing he ever wrote, and in a sense, it is an attempt to get beyond “betterness.” He concludes:

"What kind of quality of perception…can we cultivate, so that men may come together without the smugness and righteousness that drives them today, the rigidity of secure and true believers in the idols of money, nationalism, materialistic science? We know that something immense is needed to shock man out of the pathetic yet deadly heroisms to which he has been accustomed….We might then begin to think of how to give people a secure feeling that their lives count….These are gigantic problems, to be sure, and I am not claiming they are answerable in today’s world. But they seem to me to be the authentic problems of a fully critical and introspective modern consciousness."(10)

Will human beings ever be able to feel secure without the crutch of betterness? The consciousness of which Becker speaks is obviously very rare, given the frenzy of the modern world; but it is one without which there is very little possibility of freeing ourselves from sadism or any of the other grim behaviors that are currently destroying our lives. One can only hope.

©Morris Berman, 2024 Notes 1.“Hamas Massacre: Documented War Crimes,” at hamas-massacre.net. 2. Palestinian death toll in Gaza tops 36,000: health authorities-Xinhua (news.cn) 3. https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/23/whistleblowers-allege-widespread-abuses-at-israeli-detention-camp-sde-teiman; Sde Teiman: Israel phasing out use of desert detention camp after CNN investigation detailing abuses | CNN; Sde Teiman: Israeli whistleblowers detail abuse of Palestinians in shadowy detention center | CNN. See also these two videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_2RGyUCYaU and CNN exclusive: Israeli whistleblowers detail abuse of Palestinians in Sde Teiman prison - YouTube. 4. Israeli Settlers Are Terrorizing Palestinians In Record Numbers (youtube.com); David Shulman, “Israel: The Way Out,” New York Review of Books, 9 May 2024, pp. 10 and 12. 5.https://x.com/OwenJones84/status/1792180925201109153 and 'No longer justifiable': Israel faces international condemnation for strike in Rafah | The Times of Israel; Israeli forces launch new ground and air assault on central Gaza, killing at least 15 Palestinians | CNN 6. Most Israelis dislike Netanyahu, but support the war in Gaza – an Israeli scholar explains what’s driving public opinion (theconversation.com); Shulman, “Israel: The Way Out,” p. 10. 7.The following is taken from my portrait of Adler in my book Healing (Independent publication, 2023), pp. 6-13. 8.Both Ya’alon and Eitan are quoted in my book Dark Ages America (New York: W.W. Norton, 2006), pp. 197-98. Eitan was implicated in the Sabra and Shatila massacres of 1982. 9.On this and the following see Ernest Becker, The Denial of Death (New York: Free Press, 1973), and Wikipedia, “The Denial of Death.” The frenzy for meaning was studied extensively by Eric Hoffer in The True Believer (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1951). 10.Ernest Becker, “The Spectrum of Loneliness,” Humanitas, 10 (1974), pp. 237-46.

May 10, 2024

Soul-Changers

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0D3TXTV9X?ref_=pe_93986420_774957520

Wafers: Here is the poetry book I've been talking about (also available in Kindle). Hope you enjoy it.

-mb

May 04, 2024

481

Well, amigos, I didn't get 5 people for the Wafer Lunch in Houston on May 17, so clearly, that's not going to happen. Perhaps we'll try for NYC later this year or in the spring of 2025.

Meanwhile, let us continue to observe the US, and its pathetic, hypocritical universities, degrade and debase themselves, as we drift toward the Final Reckoning. And let us hope that the Palestinian people are not completely destroyed by Israel--one of the cruelest, most shameful, genocides in history.

-mb

April 14, 2024

Calling All Texans: Major Event Coming Your Way

Wafers-
I'm happy to announce an upcoming event taking place at the Museum of Fine Arts in Houston on May 16. The MFAH has invited me to engage in a discussion with the eminent Los Angeles artist, Vincent Valdez. Check him out on Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_Valdez
I am frankly honored by this invitation. Vincent is a very talented artist. The basis of the conversation will be his artwork, and the novel Slaughterhouse-5, by Kurt Vonnegut. It is scheduled to run between 6 and 7 p.m. I'm hoping that Wafers living in or around Houston, or anywhere else for that matter, can join us in what promises to be an enjoyable (and hopefully thought-provoking) evening.
I'd also like to float a possibility for those able to attend. As you know, we used to host an annual Wafer Summit Meeting in New York, which has gone by the wayside in recent years, thanks to covid and god knows what else. I'm thinking that we might resurrect the practice, but this time in Houston, for lunch on May 17. As in the past, I'll need 5 people or more to attend, for this to take place. So, if this is something any of you can do, and want to do, please write me at mauricio@morrisberman.com. If we get 5 "takers," I'll write you back with the venue. (The time will be 1 p.m.) Online contact is fine, but personal contact is even finer, as you all (y'all) know. It will be a pleasure to hang out with you, as always.
-mb

March 19, 2024

479

Wafers-

The destruction, and self-destruction, of America and Israel continues at a quickening pace. I have talked about a tectonic shift, geopolitically speaking. Which is also known as karma, as the US fades in influence and importance, and the Global South, and the historic victims of colonialism, start to assert themselves. Very likely, the Ukraine is down for the count, and a host of American opponents--Russia, China, BRICs, India, the Islamic world, and so on, flex their muscles on the playing field. At home, the US might be facing fascism, collapse, or if we are lucky, secessionist movements. Very few Americans grasp the fact that America is finished; very few have the intellectual ability to grasp it. Very few understand that our values are wrong, and that we have poisoned the world with them.

For a bit of relief--I hope not too comic--let me recommend the second story in my short-story collection, The Heart of the Matter. This would be a much better world than one hegemon replacing another. Power, power, power, as if that's all the human race were capable of. Bo-ring.

-mb

February 22, 2024

Displacing Your Rage

Well, Wafers, What's New?!

I've been listening to Neil Young's "Harvest" album, 1972. God, those were such different years. How many Americans today are miners for a heart of gold? 20? Instead, we have hearts of bitterness. But instead of Americans turning their rage against the real enemy, which they can't really identify, they attack Jews, Muslims, elderly Asian women, anyone whom they regard as different. They map their hatred onto innocent people. Bill Maher recently said on his show that "we've become shittier"--verbatim quote, my friends. "Depraved" would have been more accurate. We are a sick society, getting sicker every day. Trump in the White House will be the capstone of our collapse, and it's less than a year away.

-mb

January 27, 2024

The Crisis of Our Time

Wafers-

Here it is: my latest. Hope you all enjoy it.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CTFF8JKF?ref_=pe_93986420_774957520

-mb

January 22, 2024

Interview with Sasha White

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJwE2rxvIsc

I look like a moron, but I suppose that's OK. Enjoy!

-mb

December 13, 2023

The Charge of the Douche Brigade

Wafers-

I tell ya, I think I'm outta words this time around. What can one say? It's sorta like Tennyson's "Charge of the Light Brigade," just a bit modified: "Douchebags to the right of us/Douchebags to the left of us/Douchebags in front of us/And yet the brave Wafers sallied forth..."

This is no exaggeration. You look around, and you see the US, Israel, and the Ukraine doing precisely the opposite of what they should be doing. Is it stupidity, or the strange attraction of these countries to self-destruction? Or is that the same thing as stupidity? I don't know, anymore. But I do know that there is one place we can all go if we are interested in reality rather than insanity and douchebaggery: right here, this blog. The one shining light in a world gone mad. So welcome!, and let us continue our discussion.

-mb

November 05, 2023

Taking a Breather

Wafers-

I'd like to switch subjects for a moment, and take a breather from our discussion of the events going down in the Middle East, which has left most of us, I'm guessing, pretty depressed. The following essay is something I wrote a few months ago. I sent a memo about it to American and British journals, and (here's a shocker) got no reply. So I'm going to post it here. Meanwhile, my Mexican editor is going to translate it into Spanish; I'm guessing some journal in Mexico City will pick it up. But here's the original version, in any case; hope you all enjoy it.

The Never-Ending Conflict: Tribalism Versus Rationalism in Human History

"[O]pposing forces routinely coexist in biological systems."—Bessel van der Kolk, The Body Keeps the Score

A number of years ago I wrote an essay called “Tribal Consciousness and Enlightenment Tradition.”(1) In this essay, I was following the thesis proposed by Neal Stephenson in his novel Snow Crash, which is in turn based on the evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins’ concept of the meme: “an idea, behavior, style, or usage that spreads from person to person within a culture.” Less charitably, we might describe the process of diffusion as a kind of viral infection, or perhaps as brainwashing. It is essentially a blind process, an unthinking one—a tribal consciousness, as it were, which could also be compared to a trance, or medieval possession. In tribal consciousness, what counts for truth are not facts or data or any type of objective evidence, but blood, kinship relations, affinity groups, and community. McCarthyism is a good example of this (as is communism, of course), brilliantly illustrated by Arthur Miller in his play The Crucible. When the US Government sent the Rosenbergs to their deaths, for example (1951), the outcome of this trial was preordained; evidence was the least of the prosecution’s concerns. Cold War America was the “tribe” that had to be protected at all costs, and the trial was basically a sham as a result. In my own view, and that of a number of other historians (e.g., William Appleman Williams, Denna Fleming, Walter LeFeber), the Cold War could be seen as a trance that possessed the United States for decades, and it did incalculable damage to America in the process.

Stephenson’s focus, however, is not Cold War America but the mythological consciousness of the ancient world, which was tribal and pagan. There were, he says, various attempts to break out of the trance of magic/sacrifice/sun worship and so on; the most successful of these was Israelite monotheism—a counter-virus, he calls it. Judaism, he goes on, was the first rational religion, but eventually it hardened into legalism and Pharisaism—ritual without content—to be challenged by Christ. (“What comes out of your mouth is more important than what goes into it.”) Through the efforts of Paul, this eventually became the next meme, until it was in turn challenged by Martin Luther many centuries later. Centuries after that, Protestantism was rejected by New Age spirituality, which spits up Oprah and Chopra, leaders of the latest trance, who are blindly adored by millions. And so on. This is a cycle that writers such as John Gray (Black Mass) and Eric Hoffer (The True Believer) have described in exhausting detail.(2)

Mimetic thinking, of course, is the rule rather than the exception. It, not critical thinking, is the norm for the human race. Yet things shifted in a radical direction during 800-200 B.C., what has been called the “Axial Age.” This concept was the brainchild of the German psychiatrist and philosopher Karl Jaspers, who pointed out that during the centuries just noted, a number of sages arose, more or less simultaneously and independently of one another, espousing an entirely new way of thinking. This was what has been called second-order thinking: in other words, thinking about thinking (reflection, analysis). As opposed to tribal trance, in which people are immersed in their thoughts, and in whatever surrounds them, axial thinking consists of distance, perspective, and objective evaluation. Thus Socrates proclaims that the unexamined life is not worth living, and urges Athenian youth to question conventional beliefs; the Buddha formulates the practice of meditation, in which one part of the mind (the “Watcher”) observes the random thoughts that come and go when you just close your eyes, sit still, and concentrate on your breath; the Hebrew Prophets inveigh against the polytheism of the Canaanites in favor of the one and only God, Yahweh, who issues directives from on high; and Confucius promulgates societal rules and moral values—directives for living the good life. The world, Jaspers concluded, was permanently altered as a result.(3)

The result I am referring to is what I call the never-ending conflict. In recent years, the most famous illustration of this is the movie The Matrix (1999), although it was prefigured by Ira Levin in his novel This Perfect Day (1970). (Recall also Huxley’s Brave New World, in which almost the entire population is zonked out on “soma.”) The plot is that you have a society caught up in a trance, except for one individual (“Neo”), along with several others, who manage to see through the trance—i.e., achieve second-order thinking—and as a result, escape from that society.

The Matrix was lionized; it grossed over $460 billion at the box office during its first year. Why would that be? My guess is that there are many individuals in various countries who see their fellow-citizens as sheep, mechanically and unquestioningly going along with the dominant ideology (consumerism, for example), and doing whatever the government tells them to do. Or simply what everyone else is doing. They find this alienating, even repugnant, and so a movie based on the theme of escape from “sheepdom” is inevitably going to attract them. The fact is that rational thinking, when first encountered, comes as something of a shock. It is irresistible, even overwhelming, and once you are exposed to it you cannot easily forget it, and return to a state of “innocence.” Arthur Koestler gave the classic description of this type of awakening that happened to him when he came across Marxism as a critique of capitalist society: light, he wrote, seemed to pour across my skull; everything suddenly fell into place. All was clear now; everything made sense. Of course, years later he realized that Marxism was just another form of tribalism, after which, with the same intensity, he fell into the tribalism of anti-Marxism. Toward the end of his life, he declared that the curse of humanity was “devotion”—addiction to causes, i.e., memes.(4)

The metaphor of light is no accident. In Book VII of The Republic, Plato describes most people as living in shadows, in a cave, confusing the shadows on the wall with reality. Only a few manage to break through, to discover that the shadows are images thrown on the wall of the cave by a light coming from behind. These few then emerge from the cave into the light, get accustomed to it, and start to explore it. In so doing, they rise up the “noetic line” of awakening, until they attain the status of “philosopher-kings.” And awakening lies at the core of axiality: you see the light—critical reasoning—and leave tribal consciousness behind.

As it turns out, not quite. The problem (one of them, anyway) is that things are not that clear-cut. It seems that there is a dialectical relationship between tribal consciousness and rationality. They need each other, they define each other, and this is why the conflict is never-ending. Neither side is willing, or really, able, to give up its hold on the human mind. There are layers of meaning here; it’s not all black and white. In order to get a more accurate picture, we need to consider the following:

1.Critiques of Jaspers, and the concept of an Axial Age 2.The evolution of mind, as delineated by sociologist Robert Bellah and psychologist Merlin Donald 3.The dialectical relationship between tribalism and axiality

Critiques of Jaspers and the concept of an Axial Age are quite extensive, and often fairly insightful. The question we shall have to ask ourselves is whether, after the dust settles, the concept has any validity, and if so, to what extent.(5) To begin with, both the philosopher Charles Taylor and the Egyptologist Jan Assmann fault the theory for its apparent assumption that there is a universal history, a single trajectory for mankind to follow: one Truth, one Mankind. In other words, it assumes that there is a single path, running from tradition to modernity, with the latter regarded as superior. According to this theory, during the period 800-200 B.C. the human race broke through to this Truth (second-order thinking); but, says Jaspers, it didn’t really “take” in a major or conclusive way. Rather, the tendency was to chronically lapse back into pre-axiality. It's as though the West, with its particular (and narrow) definition of progress, is waiting for everyone else to “grow up” (the easterners Buddha and Confucius notwithstanding). In contrast to this assumption, Taylor argues that there are a variety of fundamentally different civilizational patterns of development, while Assmann adds that different civilizations have different turning points in their history. All of this generates a much more complex, and nonlinear, picture. Assmann concedes that there certainly is such a thing as axiality, but argues that there wasn’t an Axial Age as such.

In addition, the larger point Assmann is making is that the notion of an Axial Age is part of the theory of modernization, which is typically blind to the cultural achievements of stabilization and continuity. In that framework, he says, tradition and cultural memory are devalued; they appear merely as factors of regression or even stagnation—a very biased way of reading history.

Another problem with the theory: it is too rigid. Various civilizations exhibit degrees of axiality, and in fact elements of axiality can be shown to predate 800 B.C. Thus we have, for example, the Code of Hammurabi (an anthology of legal situations) in Mesopotamia by the eighteenth century B.C. And Mesopotamia accomplished quite a lot in the fields of political organization, statecraft, literature, astronomy, mathematics, and even historiography; and this is but one example. (The case of Akhenaten, the fourteenth-century Egyptian pharaoh, is obviously another one, as he attempted to shift Egyptian religion from polytheism to monotheism.) As Assmann says, it’s not all or nothing. Jaspers was a bit blind to the axiality that existed in nonaxial civilizations, and which existed prior to the first millennium B.C.(6)

I want to return to this discussion in a moment, but first let me say a few words about point #2, the critique of Professors Bellah and Donald. To me, this gets down to the nitty-gritty of it all. As far as the evolution of the brain, and cognitive development, goes, there is, Donald says, a kind of “layering phenomenon” of successive evolutionary stages, whereby the human race went from the Mimetic to the Mythic to the Theoretic. These three stages are categories of memory representation, and—the crucial point—they don’t replace each other. Rather, they just accumulate. Mimesis consists of imitation and repetition, and is the basis of crafts, dance, music, and tool use. This capacity is hard-wired into the brain; it goes back 4 million years. The Mythic phase is also hard-wired, although it goes back only 300,000 or 400,000 years, and it consists of speech and storytelling; narrative, in a word. It includes stories of origin, legends, allegories, and so on. And finally, with Theoretic culture, which eventually included axiality, we get writing systems, symbolic representation, analysis and reflection. In terms of evolution, this phase is not hard-wired. It is relatively recent, and has a cultural basis rather than a biological one. As a result—as Jaspers said—its hold on us is a bit iffy, rather tenuous.(7)

The crucial point here is that the modern mind is a mixture of all three of these modes, or capacities; there was really no “replacement” of one mode of consciousness by another. For we still dance, and sing, and we still tell stories, generate myths and narratives—in fact, we do both all the time. And if our mythologies are not religious, then they are secular (modern ideologies). True, analytic thinking can do things that the other two modes can’t, but these latter two “domains,” says Donald, are nevertheless

"extremely subtle and powerful ways of thinking. They cannot be matched by analytic thought for intuitive speed, complexity, and shrewdness. They will continue to be crucially important in the future, because they reside in innate capacities without which human beings could not function."

(Elsewhere I have referred to this mode of consciousness as “ontological knowing”—from the Greek word ontos, being—as distinct from intellectual knowing.)

Robert Bellah drives this point home with great clarity and incisiveness when he writes that narrative

"is more than [just] literature; it is the way we understand our lives. If literature merely supplied entertainment, then it wouldn’t be as important as it is. Great literature speaks to the deepest level of our humanity; it helps us better understand who we are. Narrative is not only the way we understand our personal and collective identities; it is the source of our ethics, our politics and our religion. It…isn’t irrational—it can be criticized by rational argument—but it can’t be derived from reason alone. Mythic (narrative) culture is not a subset of theoretic culture, nor will it ever be. It is older than theoretic culture and remains to this day an indispensable way of relating to the world." [Italics mine]

So much for Western notions of “progress,” which are narrow, limited, and superficial. The axial way of thinking, of knowing the world, is indispensable for the functioning of modern societies, but it is only a way of knowing the world; and although we cannot live without it, it may not be the most profound.

To return to our earlier discussion (point #1), we need to note that there is a class bias involved in the emergence of axiality. Donald’s Theoretic mode, second-order thinking, is mostly the province or territory of an intellectual elite—the Op-Ed crowd at the New York Times, for example. Today and yesterday, the majority of the population, worldwide, lives in the Mythic mode—Plato’s shadows. The average person is not a philosopher, and for him or her, what is right in front of them is what’s real. Nations vary, of course, but in the United States, it’s a good bet that more than 90 percent of the population would not be able to say what a metaphor is. Jaspers was right; for the most part, axiality never really “took,” at least not for the greater part of humanity. As I’ll indicate below, this has serious repercussions for our present situation.

Turning to point #3, I would argue that although tribalism and rationalism are two distinct ways of being, they are nevertheless entwined in a dialectical relationship. As already noted, they define each other, and this dialectic has never really gone away, as the biblical scholar Arvin Kapelrud points out (Baal was the Canaanite god of fertility and storms):

"[T]he relationship between Yahweh and Baal was a matter of central importance; and if we do not take account of this we get a distorted picture of the history of Israel’s religion. Although in the end Yahweh triumphed over His opponent, we ought, nevertheless, not to underestimate Baal’s importance. The conflict between Yahweh and Baal was more than an incidental historical episode. It was a conflict between [two] principles and interpretations of life which in other forms is still being waged today."(8) [Italics mine]

It would seem to be an eternal psychological dynamic. Applying the concept of axiality to contemporary American politics, for example, what do we find? The current violent divide in the United States, politically speaking, strikes me as being ultimately rooted in the archaic conflict between tribalism and rationalism. Millions adore an intellect-hater and fact-denier like Donald Trump, whose followers have no use for critical analysis and who are steeped in a tribal, Trumpian mythology. The “bubbas” who wear MAGA hats despise the New York Times, and what it stands for—the pointy-headed intellectuals who look down on them (“a basket of deplorables,” per Hillary Clinton). There is ominous talk of civil war, with 25 percent of the population endorsing violence against the government, as was evident on 6 January 2021, when a mob of Trumpites stormed the Capitol Building in Washington DC, in the tribal and misguided belief that Joe Biden stole the election from Trump.

A related example: If you know how to look at them, the presidential debates of 2016 are a perfect illustration of this conflict. Hillary Clinton was depending on fact and evidence to win the debate, and as a result came off as scripted and boring. Her opponent hadn’t bothered to prepare for the event; his weapons were mimesis (body language) and tribal mythology (invented scenarios, rhetoric, dramatic emotional expressions, and so on). At one point he even referred to Hillary as “nasty.” The result? He pretty much wiped the floor with her. As Merlin Donald tells us, this mode “cannot be matched by analytic thought for intuitive speed, complexity, and shrewdness.”

In any case, those on the axial side of this conflict are for the most part capable of critical analysis, but a rather large percentage of them have gone off the rails, channeled it into a strange place of “woke” ideology, where the focus of attention is on political correctness—an abuse of critical thinking, in my view, and a movement that has created its own form of tribalism. But the point being made here is that the axial issue is, it seems to me, a potentially fruitful way of framing the heated political conflict that is currently engulfing the American body politic. My guess is that this mode of analysis can be applied to other countries as well, such as Brazil, or Israel. The struggles going on in the US and these nations can, I believe, be seen as having their origins in the fundamental conflict between a tribal way of life and consciousness and an axial one; and the conflict, which is existential, would seem to be never-ending. With Trump, tribalism may eventually triumph in America; but the rational opposition to him will not simply go away. Many Israelis regard the Palestinians as a variety of savages, “human animals,” as the Israeli Defense Minister put it (October 2023), whereas the Palestinians view someone like Benjamin Netanyahu, with his desire to destroy Gaza, as a monster, a war criminal. It should not surprise us that there is no resolution in sight. As for Brazil, consider the contrast between Bolsonaro and Lula, and what each of them stands for. This mode of analysis may seem far-fetched; personally, I’m guessing that it contains more than a kernel of truth. At the very least, it seems to me to be heuristically valuable.(9)

Truth be told, the issue of an Axial Age never got resolved. Everyone agrees that axiality exists in a psychological or mental sense, and that we can investigate the degree of it in various societies, on a comparative basis. But did it exist historically? Was Jaspers right about there being a specific Axial Age that can be identified with the period 800-200 B.C.? On that score, opinion remains divided. There are eminent historians on both sides of the argument. Personally, I agree with the critiques discussed above, regarding modernization bias, class bias, and the problem of ignoring the vibrancy of other capacities of the human mind. But at the end of the day, I think Jaspers got it pretty much right: this period was a turning point in the evolution of human consciousness, and the sages he identifies as agents of the change were sui generis. Of course, they were not acting alone; I am not proposing a heroic version of history, and it’s a good bet that they were the products of deep-seated changes going on in Greece, India, China, and the Levant. But they may, perhaps, be likened to Hegel’s “world historical individuals,” who changed their societies because they epitomized changes that were already underway. It is rather amazing that this occurred across the board, in the absence of practically any cross-cultural influence. Once again, we might draw on Hegel for the notion of a weltgeist, sweeping across the globe in the space of a few centuries, and seemingly coming out of nowhere. Whatever the cause, this much is certain: the human race hasn’t been the same ever since.

©Morris Berman, 2023

Notes
1.“Tribal Consciousness and Enlightenment Tradition,” in A Question of Values (Charleston SC: CreateSpace, 2010).
2.See also another essay of mine, “The Hula Hoop Theory of History,” CounterPunch, 11 January 2013.
3.Karl Jaspers, The Origin and Goal of History (London: Routledge, 1953; orig. German edition 1949).
4.Morris Berman, Eminent Post-Victorians (Independently published, 2022), pp. 67-79. See also Raymond Aron, The Opium of the Intellectuals (London: Routledge, 1957; orig. French ed. 1955).
5.In the discussion that follows I am borrowing liberally from Appendix III of my book Neurotic Beauty (Healdsburg CA: Water Street Press, 2019).
6.For additional critiques see Daniel Hoyer and Jenny Reddish, Seshat History of the Axial Age (Chaplin CT: Beresta Books, 2019); Ken Baskin and Dmitri Bodarenko, The Axial Ages of World History: Lessons for the 21st Century (ISCE Publishing, 2014); Iain Provan, Convenient Myths: The Axial Age, Dark Green Religion, and the World that Never Was (Waco TX: Baylor University Press, 2013); and Antony Black, “The ‘Axial Period’: What Was It and What Does It Signify?,” published online by Cambridge University Press, 15 February 2008. Regarding the Code of Hammurabi: according to two scholars of Canaanite (Ugaritic) literature, the adjudication of legal cases, particularly those involving widows and orphans, “was the ordinary task of elders and rulers in ancient Near Eastern societies.” This goes back to ca. 3,000 B.C., i.e., 1,200 years before the Mesopotamian Code. See Michael Coogan and Mark Smith, eds. and trans., Stories from Ancient Canaan (2d. ed.; Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2012), pp. 27-28.
7.This section and what follows are also taken from Appendix III of Neurotic Beauty.
8.Arvid S. Kapelrud, The Ras Shamra Discoveries and the Old Testament, trans. G.W. Anderson (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1963), pp. 55-56. Kapelrud’s assertion that we are talking about two distinct principles and interpretations of life is one that is supported by a number of scholars of axiality, notably S.N. Eisenstadt in his edited volume, The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilisations (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1986). These scholars refer to the shift as “the transcendentalist breakthrough.” Eisenstadt defines it (according to Alan Strathern) as the “erection of two sharply distinguished orders of reality and modes of behaviour,” which he (Strathern) regards as “a powerful way of lending coherence to the apparently disparate ancient philosophies.” See Alan Strathern, “Karen Armstrong’s Axial Age: Origins and Ethics,” The Heythrop Journal, vol. 50 no. 2 (February 2009), pp. 293-99.
9.I am not the first historian to suggest this kind of long-range influence. The biblical scholar Baruch Halpern makes a somewhat similar argument in his book From Gods to God: The Dynamics of Iron Age Cosmologies (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009). Halpern accepts Jaspers’ thesis about an Axial Age, including (unfortunately) the Western bias and modernization theory criticized by Jan Assmann, above. But leaving that aside, Halpern argues for a similarity between the axial shift that took place in ancient Israel (which gave birth to monotheism), and the cultural and intellectual shifts that took place across Europe during 1500-1800; which is to say, the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment. But not just a similarity; rather, some type of connection, or influence. This is not a causal connection rippling down through the centuries, but only an argument that there is a psychological or mental pattern here that gets repeated; what Kapelrud is saying, in effect. In such a framework, I don’t feel that this is far-fetched, although Nathan MacDonald, in a lengthy review of Halpern’s book, does, and he offers a plausible critique. Clearly, the jury is out on all of this. See Nathan MacDonald, “Making the Past Present,” Journal of Hebrew Scriptures, vol. 11 (2011).

October 09, 2023

The Great Charade

In an interview she gave in 1980, the eminent British writer Doris Lessing said the following: "I can't remember any time in my life where I wasn't sitting looking at the grown-up scene and thinking, this must be some great charade they've all agreed to play." On an intuitive level, I had a similar perception about my childhood environment when I was about 8 or 9, and subsequent events have only served to reinforce that perception. It's one reason why I have been attracted to Lessing's novels, some of which reiterate this theme--in particular, Briefing for a Descent into Hell, which I occasionally assigned to my classes when I was teaching at various universities.

"The Great Charade" is a theme that goes by other names, in particular "The Emperor's New Clothes," a story by the Danish writer Hans Christian Andersen (it has been translated into more than 100 languages); or "Orwellian Newspeak"; or "The World Turned Upside Down," the title of a book by the British historian Christopher Hill. A more accurate title might be "Reality Turned Upside Down," for that is what we see in the MSM and their interpretation of daily events. I frequently read the 'news' and say to myself, Has everyone gone completely nuts? Like Jack Kennedy with the Russian missiles in Cuba in 1962, Vladimir Putin saw that he had to safeguard his country's borders against America and NATO, which finally necessitated invading the Ukraine. This obvious fact is recognized by only a tiny handful of astute political analysts (Mearsheimer, Ritter, Pilger, Sachs...); the rest of the world is appalled at Putin as some latter-day Hitler, ignoring what the Russian foreign minister correctly described as a proxy war against Russia, in which the Ukraine is nothing more than fodder. Self-righteous Americans, deluded up to their eyeballs, jump up and down and wave the Ukrainian flag, while American universities actually think it makes perfect sense to cancel courses in Doestoevsky(!!).

A similar charade pervades the coverage of, and reaction to, Hamas' uprising against Israel. Most of the 'analysis' of causes is plainly stupid: it was caused by a failure of Israeli intelligence. Wha?? Much to my amazement, only the NYT seems to have gotten it right: this 'intelligence' thesis is a load of crap, and the real cause goes back to 1948, when the Jews drove 700,000 Palestinians off their land. (I reproduce excerpts from the Times article in the previous post.) Meanwhile, the whole world is outraged at the Hamas uprising, when they too would be retaliating if something similar had happened to them. Excepting Palestinian commentators, the NYT emerges as the sole voice of sanity amidst--once again--a great charade.

One great danger posed by Donald Trump--and I agree that it is a danger--is that of falsifying reality, in Orwellian style; a charade, turning black into white, up into down, and so on. The raw empirical truth is that Trump lost the 2020 election, pure and simple. But if Mr. Trump wins the election of 2024 and ascends to the White House, that complete falsehood will become The New Truth. My question is: How is that different from making Russia the culprit in the Ukraine war, or making Hamas the culprit in their attack on Israel? All of it--Trump, the Ukraine, Israel--is reality turned upside down: a charade, as Doris Lessing said, that grown-ups have all agreed to play. Some grown-ups, is all I can think to say.

-mb

September 13, 2023

A Revolutionary Act

It was George Orwell who said it: "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."

There can be no doubt that we are living during a time of universal deceit. America, among others, is soaking in it. The Trumpite claim that Biden stole the 2020 election is an obvious example of this; his demagoguery is classically Orwellian. The phony proxy war against Russia via the Ukraine, the "reportage" of the NYT and others that is little more than propaganda--another Orwellian pile of crap. The fomenting of war for "democracy": you have to be brain damaged to believe such nonsense.

What can one blog do? We aren't on the radar screen of intellectual debate, and never will be. Even leading critics of America, of both its domestic and foreign policy, are ignored by the MSM and shunted off to YouTube, at best. But it is still worthwhile, for those few of us who see that the emperor has no clothes, to point it out. This is the hard rock at the bottom of all the bullshit, all the gaslighting.

Truth, like virtue, is its own reward.

-mb

August 16, 2023

The Deepest Truth

For many years now, I have been fascinated by the life and work of Remedios Varo (1908-63), a Spanish Surrealist artist who died in Mexico City at the age of 54, after having lived there for 22 years. I just read, for the third time, the superb biography of her by Janet Kaplan, which reproduces a good many of her canvases:

Remedios Varo: Unexpected Journeys: Kaplan, Janet A.: 9780789206275: Amazon.com: Books

I have in mind paintings such as (in English translation) Toward the Tower, The Escape, Rupture, and To Be Reborn, but my all-time favorite is Breaking the Vicious Circle:

Museum Art Reproductions | Breaking the vicious circle by Remedios Varo (1865-1911, Spain) | WahooArt.com

The vicious circle is the script or narrative that consciously or (mostly) unconsciously governs our lives, as I described it in my book Healing:

Healing: The Defining Root of Our Existence: Berman, Morris: 9798393548681: Amazon.com: Books

I could have easily used this painting for the front cover. For me, Varo exemplifies a life of authenticity, and a rejection of a life of conformity. This theme occurs in many of her paintings, but is most dramatically presented in Breaking the Vicious Circle. Varo was searching for the deepest truth, in her own life and in life in general. She calls to mind a quote from Virginia Nicholson’s book, Among the Bohemians, which I cite in Healing (she was a niece of Virginia Woolf):

Among the Bohemians: Experiments in Living 1900-1939: Nicholson, Virginia: 9780060548469: Amazon.com: Books

"There are people in the world who will not make compromises with life. Their faces are turned like sunflowers towards the source of light, and even when battered and broken they refuse to give in to old age, sorrow, loss, defeat."

I believe the deepest truth is what I have called the Healing Vector, the force within us that is pushing toward the light. It is the motive force of life, sometimes referred to as “entelechy.” The deepest truth is to live in Reality. I’ve struggled to make this my path, as best as I have been able; it is a lonely road, since most people—certainly, most Americans—are not interested in it. America is living in illusion, which is why it is dying. And most Americans are living in illusion, which is why so many of them are angry and depressed. My guess is that it won’t end well for them, and it certainly won’t end well for the US. (Just look around.)

Let me conclude by alerting you all to the current exhibition of Varo’s work going on at the Art Institute of Chicago:

Remedios Varo: Science Fictions | The Art Institute of Chicago (artic.edu)

Really wish I could go. Those of you Wafers who do go, please report back, let us have your reactions.

Arriba!

-mb

August 10, 2023

Our Common Humanity

The following text is from a Canaanite (Ugaritic) tablet, early third millennium B.C. It was from the Canaanite people that the Jewish people eventually emerged. The Canaanites were polytheistic; the Israelites, centuries later, were monotheistic (worshipping Yahweh). The speaker here is Baal, the Canaanite god of fertility, and storms. He is addressing another deity.

"I have a word to tell you, a message to recount to you: the word of the tree and the whisper of the stone, the murmur of the heavens to the earth, of the seas to the stars. I understand the lightning that the heavens do not know, the word that people do not know, and earth's masses cannot understand. Come, and I will reveal it."

Ugaritic is very close to Hebrew. Many of the Psalms are direct translations of Ugaritic poetry into the Hebrew language.

July 05, 2023

The Soul of Russia

Wafers-

My book on Russia, hardcopy edition, just got listed on Amazon, and should be available for sale sometime within the next two weeks. The (cheaper) paperback edition will be listed soon after that, or so they tell me.

https://www.amazon.com/Soul-Russia-Morris-Berman/dp/1648373623/

Enjoy, my friends. This book took a while, but was a true labor of love.

mb

June 09, 2023

Schmegegge

Wafers-

Truth be told, I'm running out of things to say. How many events, facts, and bits of evidence of our degradation/disintegration/debasement/collapse can we point to, on a daily basis? The sheer self-destruction of the country is right there, before our very eyes; every day, we sink deeper and deeper into it. Everything we do, every action, is an abysmal error. Years ago, I predicted 2030 as the endpoint of the nation, but I'm wondering if I should move the date up. Our slogan, "Onward and Downward," may have to be revised: "Onward and Rapidly Downward." The whole country amounts to nothing more than baloney. The government is baloney; the MSM is baloney; and the American public is baloney. The Yiddish word for this is schmegegge. Look it up on Google (it's sort of like putz squared). America is a schmegegge, a hopeless, pathetic collection of hot air.

-mb